As the nation united to celebrate our brave servicemen and women past, present and future yesterday they were nowhere to be seen.
Only the Queen - now 83 years old - was on duty, giving out medals to soldiers in Scotland. The rest, including the cosseted "boys" William and Harry, were putting their feet up.

In fact Harry, yet again, couldn't resist a night on the tiles.
He was out clubbing until 4am in London - just hours before other dignitaries turned out at the Historic Dockyard in Chatham, Kent - the focus of the celebrations.
Harry rightly won plaudits for serving on the Afghanistan front-line. But surely he must have known being pictured in the early hours coming out of a club would send the wrong message?
Would it have really been too tough to take one night off, don the uniform with the campaign medal he earned and turn out with his brothers in arms and their families?
Yes, he issued a statement with brother Prince William about being "delighted" to support Armed Forces Day.

But what did they DO on the day?
William was missing too - but at least he had the good sense not to go out on the lash the night before.
Prince Charles, whose aides were waxing lyrical about his close relationship with the Armed Forces being a key part of his job, issued a statement too - a "mission statement" brochure published this week.
In it he boasted about his relationship with the Armed Forces. The brochure states four themes:
HIGHLIGHTING the courage, commitment and sacrifice of serving personnel and veterans.
RECOGNISING their professionalism and the quality of their training.
PROMOTING the role of the Forces within national life through operational visits and ceremonial duties.
SUPPORTING the families of those deployed on operations. But actions speak louder than words.
We cannot just rely on an octogenarian sovereign to do her duty.
It was an ideal chance for Harry and older brother Prince William to step up to the plate. Frankly, the royal snub is simply not good enough. Yet again they and their royal aides missed a trick.
But William - who also had a "private weekend" - and Harry were not the only royals missing.
Charles was at Highgrove putting his feet up. Prince Andrew, a hero and veteran of the Falklands, was having a break in New York. The Princess Royal, normally praised for being a hard worker, was not carrying out official duties either.
The only other royal working yesterday was Prince Edward, who famously flounced out of Royal Marine training. He was on a golf course in the Algarve on an official engagement for the Duke of Edinburgh Awards Scheme.
Instead the Duke of Gloucester - the Queen's cousin and 19th in line to the throne - was wheeled out for the main event in Chatham.

Buckingham Palace may argue that he is a "senior royal" - but most people wouldn't recognise him if they bumped into him in the street.
The royals' absence did not sit well with the thousands of people who turned out to honour the military community. The father of Britain's youngest soldier to be wounded in Iraq, Jamie Cooper, attacked the Royal Family.
Dad Phil, of Kingswood, Bristol, said: "Harry's in the Forces himself, perhaps he should have attended one of the parades because it's in recognition of his own comrades. That's what it's all about, it's not just about veterans."

Reg Keys, whose 20-year-old son Tom was one of six Red Caps killed by an Iraqi mob in a police station in Iraq in 2003, agreed Harry should have been there.
He told us: "Harry should have attended. Every member of the armed forces plays a fundamental part in making the military what it is. Today there is a real appreciation of what they do."
More than 200 community events took place in villages and towns across the country. There were major celebrations in Manchester, Birmingham, Nottingham and Plymouth.

In Chatham, serving personnel and young recruits from the Royal Navy, Army and RAF lined up to greet dignitaries as they arrived at the Dock's Thunderbolt Pier. The Royal Marines Band led 200 current service personnel and 350 veterans.
PM Gordon Brown paid tribute. He said: "Today Chatham has spoken for the whole country. The people that have come here today have shown the high esteem and regard in which they hold the Armed Forces of our country.
"The Armed Forces who do so much, the families who make such sacrifices. I don't think we say thank you enough, today is our chance."

Armed Forces Day means something to the gallant men and women who risk their lives daily to protect us and our way of life. It means something to those whose loved ones have made the ultimate sacrifice.
Yet again the Royals have missed the point. They have missed a chance to connect with the nation.
If they stand for anything it is as a symbol of national unity.
But symbols have to be seen.
This article has 7 comments
as a serving soldier in the united staes army reserve my heart goes out to the british soldier as he is a veteran like me and i to salute the british soldier for the wonderfull job he is doing along side us we are trouly bothers in arms, so i say god bless you to you are a fine bunch of soldiers, thank you so much long live the U.K.
By stuart s davisson. Posted August 18 2009 at 2:48 AM.
god save the queen. gone but never forgotten. we will remember them
By Callum. Posted June 28 2009 at 6:21 PM.
as an ex member of the forces my heart goes out to all serving and ex members who have gone through a lot in the past 12 years and i think it only fitting that the forces should have their day
By liam mccarron. Posted June 28 2009 at 4:48 PM.
This whole day is totally contrived and I am uneasy about it. We never had a day like this before and never needed one. I am extremely grateful for all our troops have done and continue to do for us but feel that this latest gimmick is just that a big gimmick. Successive goverments have failed our Armed Forces and their families and continue to do so, whether it be Gurkhas getting second class treatment or serving personnel having to live in damp outdated homes. These events are top show. As for The Royals their only concerns are superficial Golf Games, Architectural plans and Gardening. They are not in the real world.
By CRAIG EARLEY. Posted June 28 2009 at 10:43 AM.
Why should Wills or Harry be there? Like me they are serving members of the armed forces. I can't believe that soldiers having to work another weekend is the public's way of supporting us. Whose Idea was that? We spend enough time away on tours, weekend duties and exercises. Now soldiers are spending their own time preparing, rehearsing and participating in an event that is supposed to honour them!! Take a leaf out of the USA's book. Look how they support their service personnel. Discounts, appreciation, decent pay, mortgage assistance, subsidised stores on base. Investigate and see exactly how our transcontinental allies look after their soldiers, sailors, and airmen properly. Not put on some hyped up parade, organised and staffed by service personnel.!!!
By angrysoldier. Posted June 28 2009 at 10:04 AM.
WHY SHOULD WE BE SURPRISED AT OUR ROYAL FAMILY NOT GETTING IT RIGHT YET AGAIN? ISN'T THAT WHAT THEY DO BEST? ENJOY THEMSELVES IN A VERY PRIVILEDGED LIFE AT OUR EXPENSE? ONLY THE QUEEN TURNS OUT! FRANKLY I THINK HER FAMILY SHOULD HANG THEIR HEADS IN SHAME.
By D. Fraser. Posted June 28 2009 at 9:34 AM.
As a veteren I think that its been a good day when the fine people of our country show there support for past present and future service personnel its just a pity gordon brown hasn't supported them since 1997 he's been seen more with our forces in the time he's been the PM than all his time at the treasury but there again defence is the lowest of his priorities maybe he should explain why if the defence budget has risen so much there have been so many cuts or is it defnce isn't a vote winner for the labour party
By michael partington. Posted June 28 2009 at 4:18 AM.