Ian Hyland's thoughts on BBC1¿s remake of the1970s classic, Reggie Perrin.

Leave old Reggie dead & Perri-ed

EARLY thoughts on BBC1's Friday night remake of a 1970s classic, REGGIE PERRIN?

Well, I didn't get where I am today without knowing you would be expecting me to build a review around CJ's legendary, "I didn't get where I am today . . . " catchphrase.

So I won't. What I will I say is fair play to Martin Clunes. He promised this revival would be "entirely different" to the original 1970s masterpiece, and he was right.

It's not funny.

Perhaps not disastrous enough to have us all leaving our clothes behind on the beach or even paddling off to oblivion in a canoe just yet.

But you have to wonder whether there's been a bit of a cock-up in the commissioning department.

This show was surely doomed to mediocrity the minute they decided to revive most of the characters from the original, yet write brand-new scripts.

It's the same crazy kind of logic which only this week knocked the elastic out of Pants Man on The Apprentice.

I mean, surely they could have just written a brand-new sitcom about a mentally wobbling middle-aged bloke in a dead-end job without having to sully the name of the great Reginald Perrin.

Make no mistake, dear old Doc Martin has put on a great big pair of Dr Martens and stamped all over Leonard Rossiter's grave.

Fact is, they'd even have been better off revisiting Clunes' own comedy legend Gary from Men Behaving Badly.

The brief scenes in Gary's office were a hundred times funnier and more promising than anything in this Perrin revival's first episode.

The cold fact is, nothing here is any better than the original. And most of it is a lot worse.

Clunes will no doubt be renamed Leonard Tossiter for his crimes while Neil Stuke's take on Reggie's boss CJ can best be described as "more CJD."

But the person I feel most sorry for is Lucy Liemann, who has gone from being the best thing about one lame Friday night comedy (Moving Wallpaper) to being the only good thing about another.

An undoubted talent is Miss Liemann. She could even go on to become the next Emma Thompson. If she sacks her agent now.

Of course, Clunes and his pals with probably argue that not many people will remember the original, so comparisons don't matter.

Even if we ignore that fairly patronising attitude, the fact remains this show still failed to hit the comedy mark. Even with the "aid" of a strategic laugh track.

And as a central character this Reggie is so unlikeable and unreachable you'd happily shove him in front of the next 8.16 to Waterloo.

Accuse me of getting lost in nostalgia if you like Martin, but let's not forget Reggie's initials were R.I.P.

You and the BBC should have taken note of that. And respected the sentiments.

SHOCK news from BRITAIN'S GOT TALENT where, after bowing to makeover fever, Susan Boyle is now sporting 6in heels.

So, she's using Simon Cowell's cobbler, then.

Meanwhile Cowell's mob are still desperately trying to convince us Susan might not win.

Their latest effort? Ten-year-old Hollie Steel. 2007's Connie Talbot in a tutu.

She might sing like an angel but Cowell knows kids are more trouble than they're worth. Damned child labour laws.

Elsewhere, gold-toothed DJ Talent was noteworthy mainly for the fact he has possibly spent even more on dental work than Cowell.

But I liked the look of drag act Tia Anna who revealed: "I put in hours and hours of work for what will be just three or four minutes." (Which is basically what Piers Morgan does every time he's out on the pull.)

Not much you can say about about nurse Claire Morton. Apart from: When she sings "Fame! I'm gonna live forever" on the wards, do patients sigh, "Well, I hope I bloody don't"?

Still, you had to laugh at Cowell's reasoning for why the audience loved Claire so much: "This is not the most discerning audience we've ever had."

Simon, Simon, Simon.

If discerning audiences were the norm you'd never have sold a single record, son.

Get the News of the World print edition to read more from Ian Hyland.

Your comments

This article has 10 comments

what nonsense, i was hooting out loud. it's not the original but so what, who cares? i liked it, found it funny and will keep watching. it's better than most of the rubbish on tv. you'll be saying the new red dwarf was rubbish next. if you don't like it, don't watch it.

By john .. Posted May 15 2009 at 8:49 PM.

Yes Les I totally agree about "Not Going Out" totally brilliant comedy
As for "Reggie Perrin" total waste of license payers money and a waste of Martin Clunes's talents

By ste53.. Posted April 30 2009 at 3:33 PM.

watched the BAFTAS...still no mention of " NOT GOING OUT " that's Lee Mack And Tim Vine, great writing and very funny!... 3rd. series! does no-one else think think this is the best comedy on TV? Les.

By Leslie Firth.. Posted April 27 2009 at 6:56 AM.

Let's not forget that the original version took a serious nose-dive in quality of writing during its third series and had its reputation completely sullied with "The Legacy of Reginald Perrin" some years later. Clunes is genuinely funny in the remake, but yes they could have dropped the Perrin name, and avoided this tyoe of undiscriminating laughter track that approaches the moronic production values of Last of The Summer Wine.

By Barnardo.. Posted April 26 2009 at 3:38 PM.

Actually i enjoyed the show and found it to be very funny.

By paula.. Posted April 26 2009 at 2:22 PM.

Sadly I had bad vibes about this remake as soon as I knew about it and was proved right.I switched over to see how it was going while adverts were on the other channel and within notime I switched back over to watch the adverts instead!

By jimpy.. Posted April 26 2009 at 1:14 PM.

the original was magic, but this was not even funny, what is he doing.

what a waste of tv licence money.

By sarpal.. Posted April 26 2009 at 12:13 PM.

Martin Clunes is a great actor.What on earth is he
doing taking on this load of rubbish.I dont mean the
original Reggie was rubbish but this one did not hit
the spot like Rossiter did.Instead why not film another Doc Martin which was fab.

By brian duncan.. Posted April 26 2009 at 10:53 AM.

Absolutley right ... RIP Pleeeease !! you've hit that grott nail right on the head.

What was Martin Clunes thinking? what were the writers thinking? what were the producers thinking? There seems to be a complete lack of intelligence and extreme arrogance to think they could add any value here. A worse remake I think I have yet to see. Some numpty will be thinking of reviving Faulty Towers next. Come on and get original with quality - so rare these days. Even modern classics like Life on Mars with John Simm has been sullied by Ashes to Ashes. What is the recipe for success? Good writing every time, only then should you get decent actors under the direction of a good director. If you want to stand the test of time ... do it properly and not half baked because it seemed like a good idea on your last binge drink session!

By DJC.. Posted April 26 2009 at 9:12 AM.

Ian, that was a great laugh and so true. You brighten up my Sunday, thank you!

By tracey.. Posted April 26 2009 at 8:42 AM.

Post your comment here

Please note: All comments are moderated.
Tick this box to accept our TERMS & CONDITIONS

We have to check every comment before we can allow it to be published. But don't worry, we've got a team on it 24/7 - so check back soon! Please note that we cannot publish all comments received. The editor's decision is final. Please note that your email address will not be displayed next to your comment.
We are No1 for Videos